A- de 2001
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño
✓Claimant Andres Fernando Dacosta Herrera.
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Carácter excepcional
- Aplicación para proponer o alegar nulidad de sentencia proferida por la Corte Constitucional
- Oportunidad
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Se rechazó la solicitud de nulidad de la Sentencia T-436/00 proferida por la Sala Quinta de Revisión de Tutelas, presentada por el ciudadano de la referencia, toda vez que la solicitud se presentó de manera extemporánea.
Contra este pronunciamiento no procede recurso alguno.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. Rechazar la solicitud de nulidad de la sentencia T-436 de 2000, proferida por la Sala Quinta de Revisión de Tutelas, presentada por el ciudadano Andrés Fernando Da Costa Herrera.
- Segundo. Contra este pronunciamiento no procede recurso alguno.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.